** Description changed: As done for gcc-7 and gcc-8 in 18.04 LTS in LP: #1848319, I'd like to update the gcc-9 and gcc-10 packages in focal to the final 10.1.0 release. - - gcc-10, update to the gcc-10.1.0 release - - gcc-9, update to the gcc-9 release branch to the time - of the gcc-10 release. - - corresponding gcc-cross packages + - gcc-10, update to the gcc-10.1.0 release + - gcc-9, update to the gcc-9 release branch to the time + of the gcc-10 release. + - corresponding gcc-cross packages The package builds are prepared in https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+packages [Impact] Provide an upstream release for GCC 10.1, and an update for GCC 9 to the 9.3 branch FIXME: update after the test rebuild is done. [Regression Potential] There is regression potential, however with a test rebuild of the main portion of the archive no regressions were found. [Test Case] No regressions in the GCC test suite, and no regressions in the test rebuild of the main component of the archive (all architectures) As a test, a complete archive rebuild was performed, and no regressions were found with this new package. The archive rebuild also contained updated versions of gcc-9, gcc-10, python3.8, and python3-stdlib- extensions. The GCC and Python packages should not infer with each other. [Validation] Analyze the build logs for regressions. For the cross builds, just make sure that the packages build using the updated sources. Summary of the test rebuilds: - https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20191107-bionic-bionic.html - https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20191107-bionic-gcc7-bionic.html + https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-focal.html + https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-gcc-focal.html The first one is a reference build, the second one the test rebuild with the updated components. - There are no additional regressions except for one Python test, which sometimes hangs on the buildds, sometimes passes (test_ttk_guionly). Will - be disabled in a follow-up upload. + There are no additional regressions except for pyxdg, which was fixed by + a separate SRU. Note that the riscv64 builds are purely informational, + and are not checked for any regressions.
** Description changed: As done for gcc-7 and gcc-8 in 18.04 LTS in LP: #1848319, I'd like to - update the gcc-9 and gcc-10 packages in focal to the final 10.1.0 + update the gcc-9 and gcc-10 packages in focal to the final 10.2.0 release. - - gcc-10, update to the gcc-10.1.0 release + - gcc-10, update to the gcc-10.2.0 release - gcc-9, update to the gcc-9 release branch to the time of the gcc-10 release. - corresponding gcc-cross packages The package builds are prepared in https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+packages [Impact] - Provide an upstream release for GCC 10.1, and an update for GCC 9 to the 9.3 - branch - - FIXME: update after the test rebuild is done. + Provide an upstream release for GCC 10.2, and an update for GCC 9 to the 9.3 branch [Regression Potential] There is regression potential, however with a test rebuild of the main portion of the archive no regressions were found. [Test Case] No regressions in the GCC test suite, and no regressions in the test rebuild of the main component of the archive (all architectures) As a test, a complete archive rebuild was performed, and no regressions were found with this new package. The archive rebuild also contained updated versions of gcc-9, gcc-10, python3.8, and python3-stdlib- extensions. The GCC and Python packages should not infer with each other. [Validation] Analyze the build logs for regressions. For the cross builds, just make sure that the packages build using the updated sources. Summary of the test rebuilds: https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-focal.html https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200810-focal-gcc-focal.html The first one is a reference build, the second one the test rebuild with the updated components. - There are no additional regressions except for pyxdg, which was fixed by - a separate SRU. Note that the riscv64 builds are purely informational, - and are not checked for any regressions. + There are no additional regressions except for pyxdg, which is unrelated + to the GCC update, and which was fixed by a separate SRU. Note that the + riscv64 builds are purely informational, and are not checked for any + regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879481 Title: update gcc-9 and gcc-10 packages for focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-10/+bug/1879481/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
