@laney Since librpcsvc is statically linked it does not need a
transition, just introduces a lot of FTBFS-s (https://launchpad.net/~ci-
train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4232/+packages) from which some are
the symbol deprecations from
https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.32 .

The libnsl one is smoother:

https://launchpad.net/%7Eci-train-ppa-
service/+archive/ubuntu/4247/+packages?batch=75&memo=75&start=75

Some existing FTBFSs, and the binary packages will still work without
the rebuilds because libc still ships libnsl.so.1, thus the transition
does not have to be completed.

I'm pretty enanglement with libffi is granted, and getting that through
first would be ideal.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894434

Title:
  [FFe] Please accept glibc 2.32-0ubuntu1 to Groovy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1894434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to