** Description changed: - This is to consider/discuss the possibility of whether the Ceph packages - (UCA) should be built with RelWithDebInfo build option (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE - [0]) which can be supplied to the build script do_cmake.sh [1]. + [Impact] + This is to consider/discuss the possibility of whether the Ceph packages (UCA) should be built with RelWithDebInfo build option (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE [0]) which can be supplied to the build script do_cmake.sh [1]. Currently, Upstream as well as UCA builds default to 'Debug' [0] builds. But is any reason why shouldn't go for RelWithDebInfo (i.e. "Release with Debug information")? - - There's one issue noted with RelWithDebInfo which has a workaround too [2]. + There's one issue noted with RelWithDebInfo which has a workaround too + [2]. In general, gcc's -O2 [3] build should generate better code as well as there's a specific case for Ceph [4] that it improves performance. [0] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE.html [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/do_cmake.sh [2] https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/dev/perf/#common-issues [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733316 + + [Test Case] + Standard ceph-backed OpenStack regression will be run, consisting of juju-deployed OpenStack+ceph and tempest regression testing against the deployment. + + [Regression Potential] + As Ponnuvel mentioned, the size of binaries will be slightly bigger and also the build/compilation will be longer.
** Description changed: [Impact] This is to consider/discuss the possibility of whether the Ceph packages (UCA) should be built with RelWithDebInfo build option (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE [0]) which can be supplied to the build script do_cmake.sh [1]. Currently, Upstream as well as UCA builds default to 'Debug' [0] builds. But is any reason why shouldn't go for RelWithDebInfo (i.e. "Release with Debug information")? There's one issue noted with RelWithDebInfo which has a workaround too [2]. In general, gcc's -O2 [3] build should generate better code as well as there's a specific case for Ceph [4] that it improves performance. [0] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE.html [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/do_cmake.sh [2] https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/dev/perf/#common-issues [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733316 [Test Case] Standard ceph-backed OpenStack regression will be run, consisting of juju-deployed OpenStack+ceph and tempest regression testing against the deployment. [Regression Potential] As Ponnuvel mentioned, the size of binaries will be slightly bigger and also the build/compilation will be longer. + Ponnuvel also did a search of pponnuvel i'd search of upstream bugs at https://tracker.ceph.com and didn't find any relevant bugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453 Title: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs