(In reply to dante19031999 from comment #19)
> Your starmath syntax is just wrong. The command = needs valid expressions at
> both sides, newline indicates end of expression, it is not an expression on
> itself.
> a+b_ij = {} newline {} = c+dAgree. That is how we handle the NEWLINE command. As pointed out in comment 4 and comment 5 above. And, attempt to modify parser behavior were not viable. And this becomes a documentation issue against describing behavior of NEWLINE on formula layout [1][2]. What should be said about SM use of NEWLINE command and its effect on parsing starmath/mathml syntax for rendering of formula(s) to canvas? =-ref-= [1] https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/smath/guide/newline.html?DbPAR=MATH#bm_id1295205 [2] https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/smath/01/05040000.html?DbPAR=MATH#bm_id3148730 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281053 Title: [Upstream] Math equation editor: "newline" fails after symbols To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/281053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
