[Summary]
MIR team Ack, it is a small reasonable package without too much attack
surface nor any obvious flaws.

List of specific binary packages to be promoted to main: libbackuppc-xs-
perl

[Duplication]
There is no other package in main providing the same functionality.

[Dependencies]
OK:
- no other Dependencies to MIR due to this
- no -dev/-debug/-doc packages that need exclusion

[Embedded sources and static linking]
OK:
- no static linking

Problems:
- embedded source zlib is ok (present, but patched out and not used)
- embedded source md5 is ok (this one is used, but it is from rsync which
  does not provide it as a reusable library). While there would be options
  from libbsd and libssl I think there are so many custom md5's out there,
  just many don't state it as external code - that I think this isn't a
  blocker)
  I filed https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc-xs/issues/7 for it

[Security]
OK:
- history of CVEs does not look concerning
- does not run a daemon as root
- does not use webkit1,2
- does not use lib*v8 directly
- does not parse data formats
- does not open a port
- does not process arbitrary web content
- does not use centralized online accounts
- does not integrate arbitrary javascript into the desktop
- does not deal with system authentication (eg, pam), etc)

[Common blockers]
OK:
- does not FTBFS currently
- does have a test suite that runs at build time (trivial test but yes)
  - test suite fails will fail the build upon error.
- does have a test suite that runs as autopkgtest
- The package has a team bug subscriber
- no translation present, but none needed for this case (user visible)?
- not a python/go package, no extra constraints to consider int hat regard
- no new python2 dependency

[Packaging red flags]
OK:
- Ubuntu does not carry a delta
- symbols tracking not applicable for this kind of code.
- d/watch is present and looks ok
- Upstream update history is good
- Debian update history is good
- the current release is packaged
- promoting this does not seem to cause issues for MOTUs that so far
  maintained the package
- no massive Lintian warnings
- d/rules is rather clean
- Does not have Built-Using

[Upstream red flags]
OK:
- no Errors/warnings during the build (some minimal warnings due to the
  new compiler for Wformat-truncation, but nothing severe)
  => https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc-xs/issues/6
- no incautious use of malloc/sprintf (as far as I can check it)
- no use of sudo, gksu, pkexec, or LD_LIBRARY_PATH
- no use of user nobody
- no use of setuid
- no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu
- no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit, seed or libgoa-*
- not part of the UI for extra checks


** Bug watch added: github.com/backuppc/backuppc-xs/issues #7
   https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc-xs/issues/7

** Bug watch added: github.com/backuppc/backuppc-xs/issues #6
   https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc-xs/issues/6

** Changed in: libbackuppc-xs-perl (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: libbackuppc-xs-perl (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910262

Title:
  [MIR] libbackuppc-xs-perl

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc-rsync/+bug/1910262/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to