I think it's important to distinguish: a) merely failing to reproduce the issue; versus
b) confirming reproduction of the issue against the previous version of the package (version 1:2.8.2-1ubuntu1 in this case), and then confirming that the proposed version (version 1:2.8.2-1ubuntu1.1 in this case) resolves the issue _in the same environment_. The distinction is important because if the test method and environment used is unable to reproduce against the previous version, then confirming that it's not possible to reproduce the issue with the proposed version is effectively no testing at all. Please could you confirm if the testing was actually case b, and if so detail what testing was performed? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848330 Title: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/audit/+bug/1848330/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
