Ok, performed a review of the NEW packages of fabric-manager-{450,460}.
I'll accept them as is as none of those issues are blocking, but please
fix those before proceeding with the SRUs. The packaging is in overall a
bit on the 'weird' side, but Nvidia pieces can get a bit hairy.
List of minor issues to fix:
- For fabric-manager-450 the Vcs-Browser field does not exist (looks like the
450 is not on available on github?). 460 seems to be there though.
- fabric-manager-450 has .install, .links and .triggers for the 460 packages.
These need to removed as they're just adding to the confusion.
- In both packages in debian/rules there's a override_dh_auto_build: that does
`rm -f lib*.so` - that seems like some leftover that needs cleanup.
- In debian/rules the BRANCH variable is set to 999 instead of 450 and 460
respectively. I think this should be kept up to date with the packages that are
being considered.
Accepting o/
** Also affects: fabric-manager-450 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: fabric-manager-460 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925522
Title:
Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/1925522/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
