Wow, thanks so much for the archaeology, Christian. That removal commit
explains so much.

I prefer (b) for this case:

- fewer moving pieces in the change is more likely to be reliable
- adding abstractions/nameservice to a profile that didn't already have it is a 
fairly large increase in permissions
- if the code in question is going to be gone in ten years, 'planning for the 
future' is much less important
- apparently this functionality isn't widely used in Focal, otherwise we would 
have seen more than this.

It's a bit strange to come to a different conclusion the next day; I
could probably be talked into (a) if someone else feels strongly about
it. But the simpler approach is my preference now.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890858

Title:
  AppArmor profile causes QEMU/KVM - Not Connected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1890858/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to