On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 05:53:41AM -0000, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > We finally got an answer to our questions/pings (thanks Simon) > => > https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q2/015134.html > > TL;DR: this might be wanted new behavior :/ ?! > > @Laney - You initially started this when we have faced this bug > I wonder now if we should indeed drop our delta and resolve the fallout in > other places like the formerly breaking tests. > You have back then thought deeper into this, while I only carried this delta > a few times. > Therefore I'd appreciate if you could let me know what you think of that > reply. > > P.S. Because if we drop it then I guess we better do that now than e.g. > late in 22.04 :-)
I don't know to be honest. What do you think, does that argument make sense? I don't really understand why it should be different whether you're using DHCPv6 or SLAAC, but maybe it's just me not getting something right now. If it's fine, then feel free to drop the patch and upload a NM with adjusted regexes (preferrably committing to the VCS too). Cheers, -- Iain Lane [ [email protected] ] Debian Developer [ [email protected] ] Ubuntu Developer [ [email protected] ] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894619 Title: [2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever' lifetime by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1894619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
