I think we're talking past each other again. I believe you when you say that this update will not cause a regression for users of the Xilinx desktop image who have not edited the configuration in /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config
The issue we, on the SRU team, are concerned about are the two caveats there: 1) Users of the *Xilinx desktop image*, and 2) Who haven't edited the configuration. The xf86-video-armsoc-endlessm package is in the Ubuntu archive, not just the Xilinx images, and the guarantees we try to provide for packages in the archive is that updates will not break anything that currently works. My understanding is that, currently, a user of a Xilinx board could have built their own images from packages in the Ubuntu archive and not include the metapackage containing the /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config configuration, and this would work. Also, a user of the Xilinx image who chose to edit /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config and remove “needs_root_rights = yes” would currently have a working system. My understanding is that this update would result in both of the above cases failing to work. *This* is what we are concerned about. It's possible that we need a dedicated policy for volatile hardware- enablement packages like this, both so that we can process them more quickly for you and so that users are made aware that these specific packages do not have the usual stability guarantees associated with the Ubuntu archive. If that seems like a good idea, the next step on that would probably be to start a discussion on ubuntu-devel@. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948764 Title: Fail to pass suspend/resume test To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xf86-video-armsoc-endlessm/+bug/1948764/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
