@Dan: Thanks for review! > While Debian uses 'Closes:', Ubuntu uses 'LP:', so this should be
Done > technically, debhelper 13 is in focal-backports (and even bionic- backports), but if you don't actually need level 13 it's fine to reduce it in the backport. Actually, it turns out the I did need it in a way. I had dropped override_dh_missing which is default in 13 but not in 12. It's now back in place, and the compat-level == 12 is OK as far as I can see. > I see focal has opencpn-plugins_5.0.0+dfsg-1_all.deb, which is a dummy transitional package, but there's no corresponding opencpn-plugins package in later releases. Good catch, which my Debian reviews missed... Anyway, I followed your advice and made the Breaks: and Replaces: unconditional. Update smoke test seems OK. > If not you may need to find a sponsor Yes, I need a sponsor; assuming this is the hard part. Had one contact (Gianfranco) but he seems unavailable. Is there a formal process for getting in touch with a sponsor, like the mentors site and RFS bugs in Debian? Or should I drop a mail in the ubuntu-backports mailnig list? Or? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004 Title: [BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencpn/+bug/1956004/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
