Hey Jeremy! Thanks for filling in this FFe. Did you do a test build of
the new evince for non-amd64 architectures as well (like in some PPA,
for instance)? Also, I assume that the two reverted commits for the new
libarchive support have been rather non-invasive, right? If the answer
is 'yes' for both, I think we can go ahead with this FFe.
Seeing that the NEWS file advertises the libarchive >= 3.6.0 dependency,
I was wondering: do you want/need to have this in jammy? Are we missing
out (or risking regressing) some features by sticking with the old
version? I don't think Foundations had plans on pulling in the new
upstream version past FF, but we could discuss that if there is *actual*
need for it (since it's out since last month). Though Debian's still on
3.5.2, and so far this was a merge/sync.
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963241
Title:
[FFe] evince 42
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1963241/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
