Using the Pi as a samba server, I see no difference between these
kernels. Maybe you have some cron job or other thing that kicks in
periodically or your disk is doing periodic SMART monitoring? But that
wouldn't explain why you believe there is a difference between
kernels...

5.13.0-1022-raspi

Write
10737418240 bytes (11 GB, 10 GiB) copied, 99.046 s, 108 MB/s

Read
10737418240 bytes (11 GB, 10 GiB) copied, 105.49 s, 102 MB/s


5.13.0-1016-raspi

Write
10737418240 bytes (11 GB, 10 GiB) copied, 98.479 s, 109 MB/s

Read
10737418240 bytes (11 GB, 10 GiB) copied, 104.85 s, 102 MB/s


5.13.0-1015-raspi

Write
10737418240 bytes (11 GB, 10 GiB) copied, 100.223 s, 107 MB/s

Read
10737418240 bytes (11 GB, 10 GiB) copied, 105.445 s, 102 MB/s

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962180

Title:
  Samba performance degraded after last update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1962180/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to