------- Comment From [email protected] 2022-04-06 09:24 EDT------- (In reply to comment #76) > I can confirm that just on the patch-level only two need backporting, the > rest applies as is and I have regenerated them to match the packaging > requirements. The backport-adaptations themselves are minimal. > > From the content I guess it is complex enough that nobody can be fully sure. > I'm still reading it ... > > Until then a few questions: > - I wonder if we'd also want/need dc293f6 "scsi: fix sense code for > EREMOTEIO" (to ensure this kind of ioerror gets to the guest as well) - what > do you think? > - I also wondered about 424740d "scsi-disk: do not complete requests early > for rerror/werror=ignore" but we do not have 40dce4ee applied so that should > be ok
I have nothing against including those. I was under the impression that a minimal fix is desired, and my tests indicate that dose patches are not strictly necessary. Generally I think that those are good patches, and having them is better than not having them. But then I hope most of the patches are good patches, and obviously backporting all the good patches is not very practicable -- hence the principle of minimality. It is just my two cents. My understanding of SCSI is quite poor. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967814 Title: Ubuntu 20.04.3 - ilzlnx3g1 - virtio-scsi devs on KVM guest having miscompares on disktests when there is a failed path. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1967814/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
