> These two statements seem to be contradictory. If driverless printing
is more reliable, that would seem to imply that files sent directly to
the printer print more reliably than files sent through the CUPS
filters, which would seem to imply that it is the filters, not the
printer, that have bugs.
Driverless printing does not mean sending PostScript files directly to
the printer, it means that the client discovers the printer via DNS-SD,
queries the printer for its capabilities via IPP, and then prints in one
of the formats PDF, Apple Raster, PWG Raster, or PCLm to the printer,
dpending what it supports. CUPS does this automatically if no
"conventional" print queue exists (remove any queue for your printer).
Or you can create a print queue with the lpadmin command and the "-m
everywhere" model specification.
Does this perhaps work for you?
** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968722
Title:
File fails to print when rendered with CUPS, prints fine when fed
directly to printer
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1968722/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
