Review for Package: nullboot
[Summary]
nullboot is a boot manager for environments that do not need a boot manager.
Instead of running a boot manager at boot, it directly manages the UEFI boot
entries for you.
It produces a Go binary that measures boot binaries and does some sealing,
to allow automatic full disk encryption.
It only operates on trusted data (firmware data and kernels in
/usr/lib/linux/efi).
MIR team ACK
This does need a security review, so I'll assign ubuntu-security
(package deals with security attestation)
List of specific binary packages to be promoted to main:
nullboot_0.3.0-0ubuntu1_amd64
Notes:
Recommended TODOs:
1. It would be nice to have a test plan for end-to-end testing.
- The package should get a team bug subscriber before being promoted
[Duplication]
- There is no other package in main providing the same functionality.
[Dependencies]
OK:
- no other Dependencies to MIR due to this
- checked with check-mir
- not listed in seeded-in-ubuntu
- none of the (potentially auto-generated) dependencies (Depends
and Recommends) that are present after build are not in main
- no -dev/-debug/-doc packages that need exclusion
- No dependencies in main that are only superficially tested requiring
more tests now.
Problems: None
[Embedded sources and static linking]
OK:
- does not have odd Built-Using entries
- Go Package that follows the Debian Go packaging guidelines
- vendoring is used, but the reasoning is sufficiently explained
- golang: static builds are used, the team confirmed their commitment
to the additional responsibilities implied by static builds.
Problems: None
[Security]
OK:
- history of CVEs does not look concerning
- does not run a daemon as root
- does not use webkit1,2
- does not use lib*v8 directly
- does not parse data formats
- does not open a port/socket
- does not process arbitrary web content
- does not use centralized online accounts
- does not integrate arbitrary javascript into the desktop
- does not deal with system authentication (eg, pam), etc)
Problems:
- does deal with security attestation (secure boot, tpm, signatures)
[Common blockers]
OK:
- does not FTBFS currently
- does have a test suite that runs at build time
- test suite fails will fail the build upon error.
- does have a non-trivial test suite that runs as autopkgtest
- no new python2 dependency
- Go package, but using dh-golang
Problems: None
[Packaging red flags]
OK:
- Ubuntu does not carry a delta
- symbols tracking not applicable for this kind of code.
- d/watch is present and looks ok (if needed, e.g. non-native)
- Upstream update history is good
- Debian/Ubuntu update history is good
- the current release is packaged
- promoting this does not seem to cause issues for MOTUs that so far
maintained the package
- no massive Lintian warnings
- d/rules is rather clean
- It is not on the lto-disabled list
Problems: None
[Upstream red flags]
OK:
- no Errors/warnings during the build
- no incautious use of malloc/sprintf (as far as we can check it)
- no use of sudo, gksu, pkexec, or LD_LIBRARY_PATH (usage is OK inside
tests)
- no use of user nobody
- no use of setuid
- no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu
- no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit, seed or libgoa-*
- not part of the UI for extra checks
- no translation present, but none needed for this case (user visible)?
Problems: None
** Changed in: nullboot (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ioanna Alifieraki (joalif) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: nullboot (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965115
Title:
[MIR] nullboot
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nullboot/+bug/1965115/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
