Belated response, but just for the record, Paride's recounting of upstream's position in the context of the Debian decision was definitive for me:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:47:56AM -0000, Paride Legovini wrote: > Back in the day I asked upstream their take on irqbalance usefulness > with newer kernels, here is their reply: In effect what this says is that: irqbalance is still useful, but unless the admin configures it, the policy it provides is not a discernable improvement over the in-kernel default policy. Therefore I think it is the right path forward to unseed this and let users install it in situations where they want to configure it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322 Title: Please consider no more having irqbalance enabled by default (per image/use-case/TBD) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1833322/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
