Hello, Kleber. Thank you for the instructions for installing the proposed kernel packages. Unfortunately, booting the system with the kernel 5.15.0-102.112 resulted in the same behavior, fcoe interfaces offline and reporting the FC-IDs as 0xffffffff. If you need further information, please let me know.
Best regards, ---- Anderson Soares Ferreira - anderson.soa...@embrapa.br Núcleo de Tecnologia da Informação - NTI Embrapa Territorial Tel.: (19) 3211-6200 Em qua., 3 de abr. de 2024 às 09:49, Kleber Sacilotto de Souza < 2057...@bugs.launchpad.net> escreveu: > Hello Anderson, > > Thank you for reporting the issue. We have a new kernel for 22.04 > (version 5.15.0-102.112) that is about to be released in the next few > days. Could you please test it again with this kernel and report the > results? You can either enable -proposed in your system and update the > kernel, or wait until it gets promoted to -updates and a simple dist- > upgrate will update the kernel. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057960 > > Title: > Problems on Fibre Channel over Ethernet on Ubuntu 22.04.4 > > Status in linux package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > Since I've upgraded my server's to Ubuntu 22.04.4 I'm facing problems > to make my fcoe setup to work correctly. > Firstly, some context. We have a HPE Synergy appliance with a bunch of > Synergy 480 Gen10 servers still running Ubuntu 20.04. > Each 480 server has 4 QLogic BCM57840 NetXtreme II Ethernet Multi > Function network adapters with two of them dedicated to storage > communication through FCoE. > > Recently, I've upgraded one of them to Ubuntu 22.04 and realized that > after the upgrade, all the Fibre Channel LUNs have disappeared. During the > diagnostic process I noticed that both network (bnx2x) and fcoe (fcoe, > bnx2fc) kernel drivers have been loaded properly, FCoE vlans were correctly > detected by fcoe-utils, but there was no connection between the server and > the storage and the server could not detect any LUN. > I also noticed that fcoeadm was reporting the following status: > > # fcoeadm -i > Description: BCM57840 NetXtreme II Ethernet Multi Function > Revision: 11 > Manufacturer: Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries > Serial Number: 9440C953B7F0 > > Driver: bnx2x Unknown > Number of Ports: 1 > > Symbolic Name: bnx2fc (QLogic BCM57840) v2.12.13 over > ens3f2.4093-fco > OS Device Name: host2 > Node Name: 0x10000a3d27200005 > Port Name: 0x10000a3d27200004 > Fabric Name: 0x0 > Speed: 20 Gbit > Supported Speed: 1 Gbit, 10 Gbit > MaxFrameSize: 2048 bytes > FC-ID (Port ID): 0xffffffff > State: Offline > Description: BCM57840 NetXtreme II Ethernet Multi Function > Revision: 11 > Manufacturer: Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries > Serial Number: 9440C953B7F0 > > Driver: bnx2x Unknown > Number of Ports: 1 > > Symbolic Name: bnx2fc (QLogic BCM57840) v2.12.13 over > ens3f3.4094-fco > OS Device Name: host3 > Node Name: 0x10000a3d27200007 > Port Name: 0x10000a3d27200006 > Fabric Name: 0x0 > Speed: 20 Gbit > Supported Speed: 1 Gbit, 10 Gbit > MaxFrameSize: 2048 bytes > FC-ID (Port ID): 0xffffffff > State: Offline > > Although most of information displayed was correct, the port state was > always offline (what explains no storage connectivity) and the FC-ID > reported was 0xffffffff for both interfaces. > > Supposing that something went wrong during the upgrade process, I > decided to make a fresh install of the server and, for my surprise, the > fcoe ports went online and all luns were detected correctly. > Unfortunately, the ports went offline again after a dist-upgrade. > Trying to understand what was happening I performed another fresh > install of the Ubuntu 22.04, but this time collecting some information > about kernel and packages versions from before and after dist-upgrade. > What I discovered was that all packages related (fcoe-utils, lldpad) had > the same versions before and after, the only exception was the kernel > itself. Before the dist-upgrade the kernel in use was 5.15.0-25-generic and > after dist-upgrade the kernel was 5.15.0-100-generic. > Suspecting a kernel problem I installed and booted different kernel > versions from 5.15.0-25 and 5.15.0-100 and discovered that the problem > probably was introduced with kernel 5.15.0-94, since it is the first > version showing the describe behavior. > Looking at the changelog of linux-modules package, I noticed some > changes on fcoe and other scsi modules, right after the 5.15.0-91 version. > Could those changes be the cause of the behavior observed on my server > or just a coincidence? Is there any fix to it? > > Thanks in advance. > > Anderson > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 > Package: linux-image-5.15.0-94-generic 5.15.0-94.104 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-94.104-generic 5.15.136 > Uname: Linux 5.15.0-94-generic x86_64 > AlsaDevices: > total 0 > crw-rw---- 1 root audio 116, 1 Mar 14 11:03 seq > crw-rw---- 1 root audio 116, 33 Mar 14 11:03 timer > AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay' > ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5 > Architecture: amd64 > ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord' > AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', > '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1: > CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown > Date: Thu Mar 14 14:57:14 2024 > HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=c4f1e832-fa46-4c58-913e-2093e8a4a4f0 > IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iwconfig' > Lsusb: > Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub > Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0bda:0329 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. USB3.0-CRW > Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub > Bus 002 Device 002: ID 0424:2660 Microchip Technology, Inc. (formerly > SMSC) Hub > Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub > Lsusb-t: > /: Bus 03.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/10p, 5000M > |__ Port 4: Dev 2, If 0, Class=Mass Storage, Driver=usb-storage, > 5000M > /: Bus 02.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/16p, 480M > |__ Port 3: Dev 2, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/2p, 480M > /: Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=ehci-pci/8p, 480M > MachineType: HPE Synergy 480 Gen10 > PciMultimedia: > > ProcFB: 0 mgag200drmfb > ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.0-94-generic > root=UUID=68f15721-923a-4f78-aac8-18c987d7ef94 ro > RelatedPackageVersions: > linux-restricted-modules-5.15.0-94-generic N/A > linux-backports-modules-5.15.0-94-generic N/A > linux-firmware > 20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.29 > RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'rfkill' > SourcePackage: linux > UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2024-03-12 (2 days ago) > dmi.bios.date: 10/26/2020 > dmi.bios.release: 2.40 > dmi.bios.vendor: HPE > dmi.bios.version: I42 > dmi.board.name: Synergy 480 Gen10 Compute Module > dmi.board.vendor: HPE > dmi.board.version: 10 A0 > dmi.chassis.type: 28 > dmi.chassis.vendor: HPE > dmi.ec.firmware.release: 2.33 > dmi.modalias: > dmi:bvnHPE:bvrI42:bd10/26/2020:br2.40:efr2.33:svnHPE:pnSynergy480Gen10:pvr:rvnHPE:rnSynergy480Gen10ComputeModule:rvr10A0:cvnHPE:ct28:cvr:sku871940-B21: > dmi.product.family: Synergy > dmi.product.name: Synergy 480 Gen10 > dmi.product.sku: 871940-B21 > dmi.sys.vendor: HPE > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2057960/+subscriptions > > -- __________________________ Aviso de confidencialidade Esta mensagem da Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (Embrapa), empresa publica federal regida pelo disposto na Lei Federal no. 5.851, de 7 de dezembro de 1972, e enviada exclusivamente a seu destinatario e pode conter informacoes confidenciais, protegidas por sigilo profissional. Sua utilizacao desautorizada e ilegal e sujeita o infrator as penas da lei. Se voce a recebeu indevidamente, queira, por gentileza, reenvia-la ao emitente, esclarecendo o equivoco. Confidentiality note This message from Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (Embrapa), a government company established under Brazilian law (5.851/72), is directed exclusively to its addressee and may contain confidential data, protected under professional secrecy rules. Its unauthorized use is illegal and may subject the transgressor to the law's penalties. If you are not the addressee, please send it back, elucidating the failure. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057960 Title: Problems on Fibre Channel over Ethernet on Ubuntu 22.04.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2057960/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
