Hi Nick and Julian,
Thanks for the fix and SRU template!
Question:
IIUIC, the fix simply removes 'ufw' if '{iptables,netfilter}-persistent'
is installed.
But is it possible that removing ufw is the wrong thing to do in some
particular case?
Say, if the user actually used/configured ufw instead of the -persistent
packages.
That seems possible, as users could have both installed previously, right?
(The bug report says both ufw/-persistent 'had no conflicts in jammy').
Thanks!
PS: I added an 'Other Info' section to the SRU template to clarify the
'fix released' in comment #1.
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061891
Title:
Noble upgrade breaks iptables-persistent and netfilter-persistent
usage
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/2061891/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
