> I confirm that this also affects Noble. Thanks! Oracular and Noble are at the same version of libseccomp then, so I'll mark those tasks as still open.
> ...but `docker build` always uses the build-in/default profile, so it's a limited workaround. Can Docker be fixed upstream instead, such that it works correctly with older libseccomp versions? The instructions from the Test Plan led me to https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu/dists/noble/pool/stable/amd64/docker- ce-cli_26.1.4-1~ubuntu.24.04~noble_amd64.deb, which ships /usr/bin/docker, but that dynamic executable only uses libc. How is it accessing libseccomp dynamically, if at all? Is is using dlopen? ** Changed in: libseccomp (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New ** Also affects: tar (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: libseccomp (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059734 Title: Tar fails to extract archives that include folders with certain permissions on armhf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/2059734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
