electron apps could be started with --no-sandbox with executableArgs =
["no-sandbox"] in build mode for AppImage or Snap
https://www.electron.build/configuration/snap.html .

It is also bug opened on electron
https://github.com/electron/electron/issues/41066  with merged patch for
detecting such issue on runtime with testing write for such namespaces
as PullRequst on Electron.

This change in Ubuntu for Electron is not new and there were some
attempts for AppImages for Electron to fix it because Debian and other
linuxes has various policies, so was also questions about it and some js
npms packages attempts https://github.com/electron-userland/electron-
builder/issues/5371.

So issue on Electron is opened and packagers could wait on new Electron
release or decide what to do... But require for each app to have own
profile is weird way to bureaucratic hell overhead of something not
deeply understood.

** Bug watch added: github.com/electron/electron/issues #41066
   https://github.com/electron/electron/issues/41066

** Bug watch added: github.com/electron-userland/electron-builder/issues #5371
   https://github.com/electron-userland/electron-builder/issues/5371

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072811

Title:
  Apparmor: New update broke flatpak with `apparmor="DENIED"`

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2072811/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to