I have noticed that a lot of AppArmor policies use peer=unconfined when they meant *any* peer. I believe this is also the case for bug 2040483.
I see little difference in allowing "signal (receive) peer=unconfined," vs "signal (receive)," in abstractions/base, so I proposed https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1310 but I'm open to discussion. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077413 Title: apparmor unconfined profile blocks signal sending To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/2077413/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
