Ok thanks for the clarification Sent from my iPhone > On 5 Sep 2024, at 18:41, Robie Basak <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry, I think you misunderstand. My comments were aimed at the Ubuntu > developer who prepared an update that was not acceptable for the reasons > I gave. My involvement was as a reviewer to uphold quality standards > within Ubuntu which apply to any change we make in stable Ubuntu > releases. This is necessary to ensure that we don't regress users. For > example, we must ensure that hg doesn't stop working in 24.04 next week > because of a careless change, so there must be a thought out QA plan to > ensure that this doesn't happen. This is orthogonal to the data loss > bug. > > I believe we can still fix the issue - it just needs someone familiar > with Ubuntu packaging and process to prepare an update that meets our > quality standards. I will ask around for someone to do that. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a > duplicate bug report (2073614). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070443 > > Title: > SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4 > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mercurial/+bug/2070443/+subscriptions >
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070443 Title: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mercurial/+bug/2070443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
