Here are the answer to your commands

systemctl status snapd.service
● snapd.service - Snap Daemon
      Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/snapd.service; enabled; 
preset: en>
      Active: active (running) since Tue 2024-09-10 07:08:19 CEST; 1h 
1min ago
TriggeredBy: ● snapd.socket
    Main PID: 912 (snapd)
       Tasks: 15 (limit: 9186)
      Memory: 44.3M (peak: 48.0M)
         CPU: 994ms
      CGroup: /system.slice/snapd.service
              └─912 /usr/lib/snapd/snapd

sept. 10 07:08:19 portable snapd[912]: overlord.go:271: Acquiring state 
lock fi>
sept. 10 07:08:19 portable snapd[912]: overlord.go:276: Acquired state 
lock file
sept. 10 07:08:19 portable snapd[912]: daemon.go:247: started 
snapd/2.63.1+24.0>
sept. 10 07:08:19 portable snapd[912]: daemon.go:340: adjusting startup 
timeout>
sept. 10 07:08:19 portable snapd[912]: backends.go:58: AppArmor status: 
apparmo>
sept. 10 07:08:19 portable systemd[1]: Started snapd.service - Snap Daemon.
sept. 10 07:08:20 portable snapd[912]: udevmon.go:149: udev event error: 
Unable>
sept. 10 07:08:20 portable snapd[912]: udevmon.go:149: udev event error: 
Unable>
sept. 10 07:08:20 portable snapd[912]: udevmon.go:149: udev event error: 
Unable>
sept. 10 07:13:19 portable snapd[912]: storehelpers.go:923: cannot 
refresh: sna>

le-henaff@portable:~$ systemctl status snapd.apparmor.service
● snapd.apparmor.service - Load AppArmor profiles managed internally by 
snapd
      Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/snapd.apparmor.service; 
enabled; p>
      Active: active (exited) since Tue 2024-09-10 07:08:19 CEST; 1h 
2min ago
    Main PID: 739 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
         CPU: 318ms

sept. 10 07:08:18 portable systemd[1]: Starting snapd.apparmor.service - 
Load A>
sept. 10 07:08:19 portable snapd-apparmor[739]: main.go:124: Loading 
profiles [>
sept. 10 07:08:19 portable systemd[1]: Finished snapd.apparmor.service - 
Load A>

Regard

Le 09/09/2024 à 14:18, Amin Bandali a écrit :
> Thank you for your reply and explanation (and no worries, your English
> is perfectly understandable!). I'm sorry to hear about the troubles, but
> I'm glad to hear that at least a fresh installation worked.
>
> It would have been interesting to see if the main snapd service and
> other related services were running okay in the environment
> before/during upgrade, using commands like:
>
> systemctl status snapd.service
> systemctl status snapd.apparmor.service
>
> And also have a look at their logs. But considering you likely no longer
> have access to the environment (due to reinstalling) we can't find that
> out.
>
> Since this seems like a possible snapd issue rather than a firefox one,
> I'll reassign the bug accordingly.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> ** Package changed: firefox (Ubuntu) => snapd (Ubuntu)
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078413

Title:
  package firefox 1:1snap1-0ubuntu2 [modified: usr/bin/firefox
  usr/share/applications/firefox.desktop] failed to install/upgrade: le
  sous-processus nouveau firefox paquet pre-installation script a
  renvoyé un état de sortie d'erreur 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/2078413/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to