What should I say? And this isn't supposed to be any attack on your
work. You acted professionally.

However, I am frustrated. Some 20, 25 years ago I was a Linux evangelist. 'We' 
actually were in front of the competitors in many aspects. Unfortunately, we 
lost, and fell behind. One reason was that the projects were steered by nerdy 
people. Not by profit-oriented managers. Nobody who needs the money to put food 
on the table would eventually cut his monetary supply by - without further ado 
or safety net - deprive the average user of the obvious possibility to boot an 
add-on OS.
It is a nerdy decision, to complicate things further by having two different 
behaviours for BIOS and UEFI. How many an average user to whom I wanted to 
bring this wonderful OS would want or need to know about BIOS and UEFI? 
"Afuera" to the person who decided on that.
The most useful behaviour in most cases is, that any single-OS-box 'just 
boots', without showing the OS to be booted, because there is no alternative 
anyway. And automagically does show the upcoming system(s), for the user to 
know the target OS in a multi-boot-system; and to be eventually able to change 
the boot target. "Hidden" doesn't describe this properly, I agree, but the 
behaviour is probably what a large majority of  users would perceive as 'most 
common sense' solution. And, yes, without the slightest intention to understand 
if they boot with BIOS or UEFI. 

And even if a PHB enforced such a change, any reasonable OS would make
sure, that the boot menu does show, in all cases, and inform the user
that the behaviour has changed, and that from now onwards, in order to
still be able to boot to a OS of the users' choice, the user would have
to do this and that ... Or, better, be presented with a full
explanation, the opportunity to change this by an edit, or - still
better - immediately, automatically.

It looks like people had given up to gain a wider audience for Linux
with stuff like this. And this is only a proverbial small fish in
comparison to what was messed up elsewhere. No, not necessarily
technically, but on a managerial basis. AnybodyI will only treat his
product and perspective customers like that, if he doesn't care about
'sales figures' (here: acceptance) at all.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080785

Title:
  GRUB menu doesn't show with os-prober entries on BIOS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2080785/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to