Public bug reported:

On prior kernel 6.10, i get proper values, when i use i2cdetect -y 0,
whereas on 6.11, i get the following:

     ❯ i2cdetect -y 0
          0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  a  b  c  d  e  f
     00:                         -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
     10: -- -- -- -- -- 15 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
     20: -- -- -- -- -- -- 26 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
     30: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
     40: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 49 -- 4b -- -- -- 4f 
     50: -- UU -- UU -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
     60: -- 61 -- 63 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
     70: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --   

The addresses 0x51 and 0x53 are not readable anymore, whereas on 6.10
they are. I tested this when rebooting the kernels. I am currently only
6.11, thus the output. I'll add the output from 6.10 on my next boot.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: linux-image-6.11.0-1005-oem 6.11.0-1005.5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.11.0-1005.5-oem 6.11.0-rc7
Uname: Linux 6.11.0-1005-oem x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Oct  7 13:54:36 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-10-25 (348 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10.1 "Mantic Minotaur" - Release amd64 (20231016.1)
SourcePackage: linux-signed-oem-6.11
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-05-30 (130 days ago)

** Affects: linux-signed-oem-6.11 (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble package-from-proposed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083838

Title:
  smbus on i2c_piix4 not working as expected anymore on kernel 6.11

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-oem-6.11/+bug/2083838/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to