Proposed change to initramfs-tools: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel- team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/139
Let's see what upstream thinks about that approach. For the SRU: Changing the interface of copy_libgcc to not take any parameters any more is safe, because specified parameters are just ignored. copy_libgcc is only called by initramfs-tools itself and multipath-tools according to codesearch.debian.net. I don't see any `uname -m` calls in the code or the hooks (except for one in dep_add_modules). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085157 Title: mkinitramfs fails with copy_file binary '/libgcc_s.so.[1-9]' not found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2085157/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
