I hope this issue can be resolved eventually. The non-free status of the
font in Debian is preventing me from including it in a package I'm
working on as part of my dayjob, and it appears there are multiple
licensing inconsistencies that prevent it from being used as-is. Is
there anything in particular that would keep Canonical from relicensing
this under the SIL Open Font License?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769874

Title:
  Naming restrictions in UFL considered non-free by Debian

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-font-family/+bug/769874/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to