Public bug reported:

[Availability]
The package glycin is already in Ubuntu universe.
The package glycin build for the architectures it is designed to work on.
It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64 arm64 ppc64el riscv64 
s390x
TOFIX: fails to build on armhf
Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glycin

[Rationale]
- The package glycin is required in Ubuntu main as a depends of the new GNOME 
image viewer `loupe`
- The package glycin will generally be useful for a large part of our user base
- Package glycin covers an use case similar to gdk-pixbuf but more adapted to 
the new GNOME rust applications. It doesn't intend to replace gdk-pixbuf at 
this point.
- There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should 
go universe->main instead of this.
- The binary package glycin-loaders needs to be in main to allow the `loupe` 
viewer to load images.

- The package glycin will be required in main probably next cycle as we
are looking at making `loupe` our default image viewer. We want to start
the review process now since we expect that it will need to go through a
security review which is usually taking a while.

[Security]
- No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past

- no `suid` or `sgid` binaries
- no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin`
- Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs
- Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024).
- Package does not expose any external endpoints
- Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software

[Quality assurance - function/usage]
- The package works well right after install

[Quality assurance - maintenance]
- The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and only has minor 
issues and feature requests reported
  - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glycin/+bug
  - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=glycin
  - Upstream's bug tracker, https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glycin/-/issues
- The package has important open bugs, listing them: TBD
- The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support

[Quality assurance - testing]
TODO-A: - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the 
build fail, link to build log 
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/764227141/buildlog_ubuntu-plucky-amd64.glycin_1.1.2+ds-2_BUILDING.txt.gz

1/5 install-integration-test               OK                1.62s
2/5 setup-integration-test-glycin-heif     OK                0.03s
3/5 setup-integration-test-glycin-image-rs OK                0.03s
4/5 setup-integration-test-glycin-jxl      OK                0.03s
5/5 setup-integration-test-glycin-svg      OK                0.03s

Ok:                 5   
Expected Fail:      0   
Fail:               0   
Unexpected Pass:    0   
Skipped:            0   
Timeout:            0  

TOFIX: need to sort out the autopkgtest situation
TODO-A: - The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on
TODO-A:   this TBD list of architectures, link to test logs TBD
TODO-B: - The package does not run an autopkgtest because TBD


[Quality assurance - packaging]
- debian/watch is present and works
- debian/control defines a correct Maintainer

- the package only has that minor lintian warning

P: glycin source: redundant-globbing-patterns (tests/test-
images/images/color* tests/test-images/images/color-iccp-pro*) for
tests/test-images/images/color-iccp-pro.png [debian/copyright:13]

repeated for the different images in that directory

- Lintian overrides are not present

- This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages.
- This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies

- The package will be installed by default, but does not ask debconf
questions

- Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-
team/glycin/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/rules

[UI standards]
- Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation)


[Dependencies]
- No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main

[Standards compliance]
- This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy

[Maintenance/Owner]
- The owning team will be ~desktop-packages and I have their acknowledgement 
for that commitment
- The future owning team is already subscribed to the package

- This does not use static builds

TOFIX - the package needs to be updated to vendor its rust dependencies

TODO-B: - The team TBD is aware of the implications of vendored code and (as
TODO-B:   alerted by the security team) commits to provide updates and backports
TODO-B:   to the security team for any affected vendored code for the lifetime
TODO-B:   of the release (including ESM).

TODO-A: - This does not use vendored code
TODO-B: - This package uses vendored go code tracked in go.sum as shipped in the
TODO-B:   package, refreshing that code is outlined in debian/README.source
TODO-C: - This package uses vendored rust code tracked in Cargo.lock as shipped,
TODO-C:   in the package (at /usr/share/doc/<pkgname>/Cargo.lock - might be
TODO-C:   compressed), refreshing that code is outlined in debian/README.source
TODO-D: - This package uses vendored code, refreshing that code is outlined
TODO-D:   in debian/README.source

TODO-B: - This package is rust based and vendors all non language-runtime
TODO-B:   dependencies

- The package has been built within the last 3 months in the archive
- Build link on launchpad: 
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/764227141/buildlog_ubuntu-plucky-amd64.glycin_1.1.2+ds-2_BUILDING.txt.gz

[Background information]
The Package description explains the package well
Upstream Name is glycin
Link to upstream project https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glycin/-/issues

** Affects: glycin (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Low
         Status: New

** Changed in: glycin (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2093182

Title:
  [MIR] glycin

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glycin/+bug/2093182/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to