Hey, Julia! Thank you so much for your patches!

I've updated the bug statuses appropriately, I hope that helps!

A few small notes on the patches themselves:
 - Could you please include a reference to this bug report in the changelog? An 
example of that would be "My example change (LP: #123456)."
 - For the patch header, I think you have the right idea, it just needs another 
iteration to fully match the DEP-3 format, specifically the timestamp: 
https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/
(some of the WIP documentation here may be helpful for you: 
https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-packaging-guide/pull/87)
 - The version number seems okay, but no need to target it at -security unless 
you intend for this to go through the security pocket.
 - It is best practice to follow existing conventions for patch names if doing 
a non-security upload. In this case, that would involve adding a numbered 
prefix.

Lastly, the bug description seems like a great start, but could you please 
consider adding more details? Here are the specific details I'd add:
 - Is this patch fixed upstream anywhere, and if so, do you have a link?
 - I would assume Plucky is not affected, but could you explicitly point that 
out?
 - I appreciate the details in "Where problems could occur", but is there any 
downside to using the "exist?" Ruby method here? In my own experience, I often 
find this to be the most "obviously redundant" section, but it's still 
important, nonetheless.

Once you have updated patches, please do re-subscribe Ubuntu Sponsors to
this bug, and we'll be happy to give you an updated review. You could
also join #devel:ubuntu.com on Matrix if you have any specific
questions, or want to keep your finger on the pulse when it comes to
Ubuntu Development, so to speak.

I really appreciate your efforts here! This patch is most of the way
there, just some tweaks, and it'll be ready to go!

Best wishes,
Simon

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098878

Title:
  Deprecated exists? call in ruby >= 3.2.0 causes dependent build
  failure

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-blade/+bug/2098878/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to