I'm not so much concerned about picking up the XFS patches, more that we test that they don't introduce regressions (and, ideally, that they work ☹).
For example, it's not obvious from the test suite whether or not booting from an XFS filesystem is a part of the standard tests; it would be good to ensure that here. I'd be happy enough with a single test that's just “create an XFS /boot; boot from it”. It would be *nice* to also test the large-extent code, but it's not clear to me that Jammy and Focal kernels can actually read the large- extent format. If XFS-booting *is* covered by the standard test-suite, great! I'll just accept this. If it's not, we should add an explicit test to the test plan. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055835 Title: GRUB 2025 spring security update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2055835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
