Hi Luciano, > We don't build Ceph for 32-bit architectures any more (I don't know enough > about the details, only that it's not done).
That may be true for noble onward, but if you look at jammy and focal, where this package is going, ceph is still very much supported on 32 bit arches. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/17.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/29860350 ceph 17.2.9 built correctly on all architectures with both -proposed and -updates with the latest debdiff, riscv finally completed. This is pretty much ready for uploading now. I just have one more question. dpkg-gensymbols created an abnormally large amount of changed symbols, coming down the inclusion of the vendored boost library for ceph-exporter. Usually, any symbol changes at all are not allowed, but the very same list of symbol changes was accepted for 19.2.1-0ubuntu0.24.04.2, so maybe it might be okay. I attached the list of new symbols. I will likely ask ROAF tomorrow during his SRU shift on what we should do with all these symbol changes. Is the Security team aware we are turning on this vendored boost library? What happens if there is a CVE in boost and it needs fixing? Will anyone patch ceph? Thanks, Matthew ** Attachment added: "Symbol changes for 17.2.9 dpkg-gensymbols" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/2100625/+attachment/5902173/+files/dpkg_gensymbols_warning.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100625 Title: [SRU] ceph 17.2.9 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2100625/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
