When asking for an SRU to a specific release, please specify exactly the
status on *other* releases, I shouldn't have to go hunt that information
down.
This doesn't *sound* like something that fits the SRU criteria. In
particular, read the second sentence in the "Minimise regression".
As a rule of thumb, if you write "The regression risk should be minimal
here" in "What problem could occur", you're likely wrong. Only in very
rare cases is it actually true. Here, you're going to break any code
that parses this command's output a little too strictly, which is too
high a cost for the stated impact.
I'm closing this as Won't Fix on Jammy, Fix Released on Noble and above.
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Plucky)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2119336
Title:
lsblk: id column is missing in Jammy
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/2119336/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
