Two points to address from the previous AA review (from schopin [1]): > I'd really like for the hardcoded lib dependencies to be dealt with at some point. It seems they're unused in the final binary (hence dh- shlibdeps confusion), maybe they were deps of previous stages that are carried over?
I think this is correct. The zig compiler is built in three stages. The second stage uses LLVM. The final binary is created in stage3. > Also, the d/copyright doesn't actually match the reality, that could also be enhanced later on (use `lrc` to get a glimpse at some of the issues, among the many false positives). The major discrepancy reported by lrc is because d/copyright refers to "Apache 2.0 with LLVM-exception" as "LLVM-Exception" and "APACHE-2.0-WITH-LLVM-EXCEPTION". For such files "licensecheck" reports "Apache 2.0". These are also false flags. I could list them in debian/lrc.config, but the list will be long because the format does not support wildcards. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2115473/comments/7 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2132991 Title: [needs-packaging] zig0.15 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2132991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
