Thomas Ward:
> NEW actually gets processed faster than you think

I had a source package rename in NEW queue that took 8 months to get
processed. I've never had any package of my own, or of those uploads I
sponsored get processed in under 3 days are you state as an example. If
you look at the current queue of ~400 packages, the median is somewhere
around 2 months.

The work to package usql was originally done in April 2025, including
having it up for review in Gateway to New at
https://salsa.debian.org/newgateway-team/reviews/-/issues/10, and
uploaded on April 21st to experimental (https://ftp-
master.debian.org/new/usql_0.19.19-1~exp1.html).

It got then rejected in May, giving requirements of what is acceptable
vendoring. I re-did it accordingly, and after getting more dependencies
into Debian, I re-uploaded it in August. It has now been pending review
since. If my package gets into Ubuntu, all my work would not have been
in vain.


** Bug watch added: salsa.debian.org/newgateway-team/reviews/-/issues #10
   https://salsa.debian.org/newgateway-team/reviews/-/issues/10

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2136092

Title:
  [needs-packaging] usql

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2136092/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to