Hi Timothy. I've been working on getting this patched in. The patches seem to build alright. Currently working on confirming the performance improvements and quantifying them before writing an sru. I think in this case a sufficient test plan could be simply building Luster, setting up a new volume, creating a few thousand files, and measuring du performance between patched and unpatched gnulib. Do you know if this is an issue that affects luster when installed as a client or server on ubuntu? Just the client would be alot easier to test as it seems lustre does not currently support any version of ubuntu as a server and has some trouble building the latest lts.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2137373 Title: Slow du performance on Lustre for large directories To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnulib/+bug/2137373/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
