Hi Frank, Jen, I have attempted to add prerequisite commits to the list provided in the comment above [1]. Would it be possible to confirm that the list below is the one that we want to apply:
561b8d48f s390: Lower severity of assembler syntax errors from fatal to error f6cd3c4a8 s390: Enhance handling of syntax errors in assembler 11fe57be7 s390: Do not erroneously use base operand value for length operand 398065c7d s390: Correct setting of highgprs flag in ELF output c7fc47b27 s390: Add comments to assembler operand parsing logic 539328f9c s390: Add test cases for base/index register 0 bf1df8b98 s390: Add test case for disassembler option warn-areg-zero 15f367eea s390: Revise s390-specific assembler option descriptions a052bc7aa s390: Warn when register name type does not match operand 441a10e14 s390: Print base register 0 as "0" in disassembly fce30bb8b s390: Allow to explicitly omit base register operand in assembly 72ab3f885 s390: Provide operand number in assembler warning and error messages c81f07c05 s390: Be more verbose about missing operand type e6c40194d s390: Document syntax to omit base register operand e64fa3d04 s390: Simplify (dis)assembly of insn operands with const bits e3dbbe971 s390: Add arch15 instructions 78305ecc8 s390: Add arch15 instruction names c5ab651fe s390: Add arch15 Concurrent-Functions Facility insns d3110d9cc s390: Fix disassembly of optional addressing operands 089a164a6 s390: Treat addressing operand sequence as one in assembler cf6190f84 s390: Treat addressing operand sequence as one in disassembler a3ce50326 s390: Simplify parsing of omitted index register operand 146ab6ba4 s390: Additional tests for omitted base register operands b24c12bc9 s390: Do not omit vector index register 0 in disassembly 5d19f6e77 s390: Do not warn about vector index register 0 in assembly 2635bf9c7 s390: Error if vector index register omitted in assembly 3763d3c4c s390: Add support for z17 as CPU name Best Regards, Vladimir. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2108997/comments/47 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2108997 Title: [SRU] GDB: Internal binutils code requires updates made for IBM z17 in binutils already To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2108997/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
