Thank you, Andreas! I am currently building an updated version in https://launchpad.net/~kobuk-team/+archive/ubuntu/oneapi-dev
The changes are mostly captured in this PR: https://github.com/canonical/oneapi-packaging/pull/27 There were some previous updates I made to d/copyright in this commit as well: https://github.com/canonical/oneapi- packaging/commit/9a8c05bd0b8b953567037c46e0f2df19afdd6f3d I have addressed all your comments/suggestions, and below I'll give a bit more detail on my reasoning on some changes: > I believe there is a file conflict here, can you please check? Fixed, renamed the man file to clang-dpcpp.1. > I have never heard of "Khronos" license before. Quick google shows that they tend to use apache 2.0 or MIT, so maybe this is one such case. I found MIT-Khronos-old (https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT-Khronos-old.html) and used it for these files. > Was this suffix supposed to have a git hash? I found the approach used for ROCm and took the same approach, i.e. I replaced the git suffix with dpcpp$version. So the .so is now named libclang.so.21.0.0dpcpp6.2.0. > c) Architectures Yes, amd64 is the only supported architecture. Maybe it's technically possible to build for other archs, but this is not something Intel tests or validates, nor is this something I have tested. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2130186 Title: [needs-packaging] intel-dpcpp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2130186/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
