This is not an opinion. I and perhaps many other use these Icons to customize and set up their desktop. Example would be a copy put in /home//.local/share/applications. I currently have 27 of them. I is extermly harder to find the right.destop file without the icons as the naming of desktop file has got very long like [gnome-online-accounts-panel.desktop] making it hard to find the correct one!!! in a long list. Also seems too many developers want to put everything directly under category Applications->Accessories when so many should live elsewhere, perhaps under a system menu. This causes me having to rework so many to a better category. The problem with developers is they have a preconception on how a program might work to get a result, but most users DO NOT and are at a loss when they have no idea why or what is happening. After all an icons main objective is a visual clue/queue for what it IS, IS
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1819375 Title: Unable to launch applications from Nautilus by visiting /usr/share/applications and clicking on icon of application To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1819375/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
