What is the plan for libjpeg8-empty? Should it be removed from the
stonking archive?
Package: libjpeg8
Architecture: any
Section: libs
Multi-Arch: same
Depends: libjpeg-turbo8 (>= 1.1.90+svn722-1ubuntu6), ${misc:Depends}
Description: Independent JPEG Group's JPEG runtime library (dependency package)
libjpeg8 dependency package, depending on libjpeg-turbo8.
Package: libjpeg8-dev
Architecture: any
Section: libdevel
Multi-Arch: same
Depends: libjpeg-turbo-dev (>= 1.1.90+svn722-1ubuntu6), libjpeg8
(=${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}
Description: Independent JPEG Group's JPEG runtime library (dependency package)
libjpeg8-dev dependency package, depending on libjpeg-turbo8-dev.
Package: libjpeg-dev
Architecture: any
Section: libdevel
Multi-Arch: same
Depends: libjpeg8-dev
Description: Independent JPEG Group's JPEG runtime library (dependency package)
This package will always depend on the current default JPEG library
development package version.
** Also affects: libjpeg8-empty (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2144628
Title:
Sync from Debian or document why package permanently has diverged in
Ubuntu
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg-turbo/+bug/2144628/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
