# rocalution 7.2.4 SRU (resolute) — build / autopkgtest / lintian report - **Date:** 2026-07-14 - **Test environment:** `igor-resolute` LXC container (Ubuntu resolute), with `ppa:bullwinkle-team/rocm-7.2.4-resolute-sru` enabled for the ROCm 7.2.4 build-deps not yet in the archive. - **Current in resolute:** `rocalution` 7.1.1-0ubuntu1 - **Proposed SRU:** `rocalution` 7.2.4-1~exp1~26.04.1
## 1. Build `dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -b` for 7.2.4 completed successfully: all four binaries (`librocalution1`, `librocalution1-tests`, `librocalution-dev`, `librocalution-doc`) plus dbgsym packages were produced. The package's own test suite (rocALUTION gtest suite, run via `dh_auto_test-arch`) passed as part of the build. ## 2. Autopkgtest Ran with the `null` backend directly against the built 7.2.4 binaries (`autopkgtest -B rocalution_*.dsc *_7.2.4-1~exp1~26.04.1~exp1_*.deb -- null`): ``` autopkgtest [14:48:13]: test command1: - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - - - - - command1 PASS autopkgtest [14:48:13]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary command1 PASS ``` **Result: PASS.** The single declared test (`debian/tests/control`, running `librocalution1-tests`' `rocalution-test` binary) passed; the numerous `SKIPPED` sub-cases are the package's own gtest filtering (e.g. arch-specific skips), not failures. ## 3. Lintian comparison — current (7.1.1) vs proposed (7.2.4) Same flags used for both: `lintian -Evi --pedantic`. Baseline binaries/source for 7.1.1-0ubuntu1 were fetched from the resolute archive; 7.2.4 binaries/source were built locally as above. ### Binaries | | 7.1.1-0ubuntu1 (current) | 7.2.4-1~exp1~26.04.1 (proposed) | |---|---|---| | Tags found | 2 | 2 | Both versions report the **exact same** two pedantic tags, both in `librocalution-doc`: ``` X: librocalution-doc: duplicate-files usr/share/doc/librocalution-dev/html/_sphinx_design_static/design-tabs.js usr/share/doc/librocalution-dev/html/_static/design-tabs.js X: librocalution-doc: duplicate-files usr/share/doc/librocalution-dev/html/_sphinx_design_static/sphinx-design.min.css usr/share/doc/librocalution-dev/html/_static/sphinx-design.min.css ``` No other binary package (`librocalution1`, `librocalution1-tests`, `librocalution-dev`) has any lintian tag in either version. **Verdict: no regression — identical.** ### Source | | 7.1.1-0ubuntu1 (current) | 7.2.4-1~exp1~26.04.1 (proposed) | |---|---|---| | Tags found | 8 | 7 | Diff between the two tag lists: ```diff - prefer-uscan-symlink filenamemangle s%(?:.*?)?v?(\d[\d.]*)\.tar\.gz%rocalution-$1.tar.gz% [debian/watch:4] + prefer-uscan-symlink filenamemangle s%.*/rocm-@ANY_VERSION@%rocalution-$1% [debian/watch:5] - very-long-line-length-in-source-file 4170 > 512 [toolchain-windows.cmake:19] ``` Both differences are expected, not regressions: 1. `prefer-uscan-symlink` — same tag, different text/line, because `debian/watch` was intentionally rewritten for the ROCm monorepo migration. 2. `very-long-line-length-in-source-file` on `toolchain-windows.cmake` is **gone** in 7.2.4 — the long line was shortened/removed upstream, so this is one fewer finding, not a new one. All other 7 tags are identical across both versions (debian-watch signature check, `debian/copyright` year update note, and the remaining upstream long-line notices in docs/.github files). **Verdict: no regression — functionally identical**, with one pre-existing tag having disappeared for the better. ## Summary - Build: OK - Autopkgtest: PASS - Lintian binaries: identical to current archive version (2/2 tags match, docs package included) - Lintian source: identical modulo two expected/explained differences, no new issues introduced -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2154350 Title: SRU: New upstream version 7.2.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rocalution/+bug/2154350/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
