Yes, my concerns are in the comments of bug #178424. The problem is not as simple as a new octave package depending on octave3.0. There are quite a few reverse(-build)-dependencies. We also should think what to do with octave2.9. Leaving both in an LTS release doesn't seem wise to me.
I still think it's best to ask Debian octave team first. -- [MoM SYNC] octave3.0 3.0.0-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185653 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
