This was held back for stonking: it was too close to the release to
remove a stack of existing s390x binaries. Now that tenacious is open,
please action it there.

libosmocore 1.14.2-1 still fails to build on s390x in tenacious-proposed
(upstream dropped big-endian support, configure refuses to run), and it
now blocks libosmo-abis 2.2.0-2, libosmo-sigtran 2.3.0-2, osmo-mgw
1.16.1+dfsg1-2, osmo-bsc 1.15.0-2, osmo-msc 1.16.0+dfsg1-2, osmo-bts
1.12.0+dfsg1-2 and osmo-hlr 1.9.4+dfsg1-2 in tenacious-proposed.

Analysis below is from the tenacious s390x Packages and Sources indices
of 2026-11-03. Removing the s390x binaries of the 7 sources below leaves
no other s390x binary uninstallable: the only reverse dependencies are
inside the set.

== Removals from tenacious (release pocket), s390x only ==

--- libosmocore 1.11.0-2build1 ---
s390x binaries (21): libosmocodec4 libosmocoding0 libosmocore libosmocore-dev 
libosmocore-utils libosmocore22 libosmoctrl0 libosmogb14 libosmogsm20 
libosmoisdn0 libosmosim2 libosmovty13, plus the arch:all -doc packages 
(libosmocodec-doc libosmocoding-doc libosmocore-doc libosmoctrl-doc 
libosmogb-doc libosmogsm-doc libosmoisdn-doc libosmosim-doc libosmovty-doc), 
which only need to go from the s390x indices
Reverse-Depends on s390x: gr-gsm, libosmo-cc, osmo-ggsn, osmo-pcu, osmo-tetra, 
osmocom-analog (all listed below)
Reverse-Build-Depends that still have s390x binaries: the same sources, plus 
libosmo-sigtran (only the arch:all libosmo-sigtran-doc). The others 
(libosmo-abis, libosmo-netif, libosmo-sccp, osmo-bsc, osmo-bts, osmo-cbc, 
osmo-hlr, osmo-iuh, osmo-mgw, osmo-msc, osmo-sgsn, osmo-trx) have no s390x 
binaries in tenacious
Debian: 1.14.2-1 has no s390x build in unstable or testing (Build-Attempted on 
all big-endian architectures)

--- gr-gsm 1.0.0~20220727-3build1 ---
s390x binaries: gr-gsm
Reverse-Depends on s390x: none (only hamradio-nonamateur, arch:all, Recommends 
it)
Reverse-Build-Depends: none
Debian: no s390x binary (3+b1 is built for amd64 arm64 armhf i386 loong64 
ppc64el riscv64)

--- libosmo-cc 0.0~git20260628.89bc8f6-2 ---
s390x binaries: libosmocc3 libosmo-cc-dev
Reverse-Depends on s390x: osmocom-analog (listed below)
Reverse-Build-Depends: osmocom-analog
Debian: the s390x binary is still in unstable and testing, built against the 
old libosmocore 1.11 s390x binaries that Debian also still carries

--- osmo-ggsn 1.13.0-2build1 ---
s390x binaries: osmo-ggsn libgtp11 libgtp-dev
Reverse-Depends on s390x: none
Reverse-Build-Depends: osmo-sgsn (libgtp-dev), which has no s390x binaries
Debian: no s390x binary (unstable 1.15.0-1 and testing 1.13.0-2+b2)

--- osmo-pcu 1.5.1-1build1 ---
s390x binaries: osmo-pcu
Reverse-Depends on s390x: none
Reverse-Build-Depends: none
Debian: no s390x binary (1.5.3-1 is built for amd64 arm64 loong64 ppc64el 
riscv64)

--- osmo-tetra 0.0~git20230902.c0956b9-3 ---
s390x binaries: osmo-tetra
Reverse-Depends on s390x: none
Reverse-Build-Depends: none
Debian: no s390x binary in unstable

--- osmocom-analog 0.0~git20251206.0c72677-1 ---
s390x binaries: osmocom-analog
Reverse-Depends on s390x: none
Reverse-Build-Depends: none
Debian: no s390x binary (built for amd64 arm64 armhf loong64 riscv64)

== NBS cleanup in tenacious-proposed ==

britney also rejects libosmo-abis and osmo-mgw for "old binaries left" in 
tenacious-proposed. Nothing in tenacious-proposed depends on them (only the 
release versions do, and those are being replaced), so please remove them too:
- libosmoabis15 (from libosmo-abis 2.1.0-1), on amd64 amd64v3 arm64 ppc64el 
riscv64
- libosmo-mgcp-client14 (from osmo-mgw 1.15.0+dfsg1-1), on amd64 amd64v3 arm64 
ppc64el riscv64

Once this is done, the osmo stack can migrate together.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2169012

Title:
  libosmocore 1.14.2-1 FTBFS on s390x: upstream dropped big-endian
  support, s390x binaries need removal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libosmocore/+bug/2169012/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to