With regard to (i), the more usual case where I find myself needing this is a remote-to-local or local-to-remote move, not a remote-to-remote move, and I agree that an interface similar to scp would be convenient. That's why I haven't closed this.
(ii) is a valid point, but I'd like openssh to be useful standalone, not just when augmented with sshfs. Not all users can use sshfs, for example if they aren't in the fuse group on the system in question. I am frequently in this position on company machines, for instance. -- there is no 'move' equivalent for scp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92167 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
