Certainly you can understand that a bug report on a random package is
not the place to put in question a process as critical as stable release
updates.

I understand the upstream Glom developers are responsible enough to do
high quality stable releases, nevertheless the current SRU process
requires a "minimal patch", typically something which a human can review
and where one can claim it is a completely understood and safe change.

Perhaps this process is too strict for Glom in particular and we
certainly bend the process a little for GNOME point releases for
instance, but keep in mind there are also other mechanisms to bring new
releases to stable users (e.g. backports) if you don't want this
particular problem to be fixed.

My suggestions would be to:
- discuss the strictness of the SRU process with the Ubuntu developers at 
large; I believe this shouldn't happen in a bug report or on your blog, but 
rather on the Ubuntu mailing lists; perhaps ubuntu-devel-discuss@ or 
ubuntu-devel@
- in this bug, prepare a minimal patch or wait for someone to create one 
addressing only the grave issue you mention which requires a SRU

-- 
Can't change field types
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186869
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to