Putting something in the title to show which release the bug was _found_ in is helpful so that it is easy to determine what the priority is for the person looking at the thing in a list. No renaming is necessary... if I found a bug in Hardy, it's going to have [Hardy] attached to it, and that shouldn't be changed. If Hardy+4 comes out and the bug is still open, well, the bug is still open. Why would it need to be renamed? The only thing bugs need is to be worked on and closed, right? :-)
A little more on-topic, when will cairo actually hit the repositories? Shouldn't bugs that have not had their fixes actually released yet be marked as fix-committed, until the repositories are updated? -- evince prints lines of text at a 45 degree angle https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199493 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
