Thanks for looking into this Steve.
If the problem is indeed only the missing TERM, then I think this is not
high priority anymore and more a bug in the upgrade tester (and package
tester) than in mdadm. While I think maintainer scripts should not fail
if TERM is unset, I also think its something that is very rare in
practice.
Cheers,
Michael
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu)
Target: ubuntu-8.04-beta => None
--
autopkgtest gutsy mdadm amd64: erroneous package!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141625
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
