[00:04] <ScottK2> sistpoty: Would you please ack Bug 204959
[00:04] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 204959 in xapian-bindings "Please sync
xapian-bindings 1.0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,New]
https://launchpad.net/bugs/204959
[00:05] <ScottK2> It builds which is better we have now.
[00:05] <persia> Isn't that version also required to match the current
libxapian?
[00:06] <ScottK2> Yes
[00:07] <ScottK2> But it's a new upstream, so I want an ack.
[00:09] <sistpoty> ScottK2: there are two rdepends... did the API change?
[00:10] <sistpoty> (in an incompatible way)
[00:10] <-- xtknight has left this server (Remote closed the connection).
[00:10] * ScottK2 looks.
[00:10] --> LucidFox has joined this channel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/Sikon).
[00:11] <-- santiago-ve has left this server ("<?php
if(HAS_NOTHING_TO_DO){die();} ?>").
[00:13] --> gordon_ has joined this channel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
[00:13] <-- gordon_ has left this server (Client Quit).
[00:14] <ScottK2> sistpoty: From reading Changelog and NEWS, no. Currently we
have xapien-bindings and xapiend-core on different versions. I think having
them the same and having the bindings buildable is way better than whatever
risk there is of bumping.
[00:16] <sistpoty> ScottK2: hm.. I don't see a xapiend-core?
[00:17] <ScottK2> It would help if I could spell
[00:17] <ScottK2> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xapian-core
[00:18] <sistpoty> heh
[00:18] <-- gordon has left this server (Remote closed the connection).
[00:19] <sistpoty> yes, that makes sense to me, ACK'd
[00:19] <ScottK2> Thanks
** Changed in: xapian-bindings (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Please sync xapian-bindings 1.0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204959
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
