Andrew, This is likely a side effect of switching versions between different repos. Please purge (apt-get remove --purge $PACKAGE) all instances of lirc-modules-source before installing a new one.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Andrew Barbaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > err. that's actually what i am in the process of doing right now. building > lirc0.8.3pre1 seems to be more difficult than cvs (since it is not using > automake?) > > Also, trying to install the lirc-modules-source from your repository does > not complete. I'm left with this error: > > You must run a dkms build for kernel 2.6.24-12-generic (i686) first. > Done. > > Any advice? > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Mario Limonciello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Andrew, > > > > Sounds like a sensible plan of action, but I see a point for failure. > > There > > is a handful of 2.6.24 patches that came after 0.8.3~pre1. > > > > Maybe the better idea is to apt-get source lirc, and then dpatch > > apply-all. > > Run the standard build process (configure/make not debuild) to make sure > > nothing in the build system that we have on top is breaking it. > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Andrew Barbaccia < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > So here's my plan of action. Let me know your thoughts: > > > > > > nstall lirc0.8.3pre1 from source and test sending via lirc_serial > > > this will determine if it is the package or the source that is broken. > > if > > > it > > > works, then we need to find the differences in the build options to > get > > it > > > building correctly. if it fails, we need to find the patch between > pre1 > > > and > > > cvs that corrects the problem and apply. > > > Test patches on pre1 SOURCE (not package) until we narrow down which > > patch > > > makes the fix > > > Once the patch is determined then we can go ahead and fix the current > > > package and push it to hardy. > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Mario Limonciello <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > So it's not in the modules, it is, it's not, it is. I hate when > > things > > > > go in circles like this :) Hopefully we'll get to the bottom of > this > > > > soon. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > lirc_serial loads but does not work (Gutsy 7.10 + Hardy 8.04) > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182530 > > > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct > subscriber > > > > of the bug. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Andrew Barbaccia > > > MonolithMC Sales & Support > > > (631) 865 - 1025 > > > > > > -- > > > lirc_serial loads but does not work (Gutsy 7.10 + Hardy 8.04) > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182530 > > > You received this bug notification because you are a member of MythTV > > > Ubuntu Maintainers, which is subscribed to lirc in ubuntu. > > > > > > > > > -- > > Mario Limonciello > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > lirc_serial loads but does not work (Gutsy 7.10 + Hardy 8.04) > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182530 > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > > of the bug. > > > > > -- > Andrew Barbaccia > MonolithMC Sales & Support > (631) 865 - 1025 > > -- > lirc_serial loads but does not work (Gutsy 7.10 + Hardy 8.04) > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182530 > You received this bug notification because you are a member of MythTV > Ubuntu Maintainers, which is subscribed to lirc in ubuntu. > -- Mario Limonciello [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- lirc_serial loads but does not work (Gutsy 7.10 + Hardy 8.04) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182530 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
