Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: wpasupplicant

Background: I'm not using NetworkManager at all.  All disabled, custom
wpa_supplicant.conf and custom /etc/network/interfaces.  I manually
control interfaces with ifup/ifdown and wpa_cli.  This was working fine
in Gutsy.  Specifically the ability to add a bssid=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
line to a network block in /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf.  When I do that now
(Hardy), everything appears to be working but association never happens.
In fact, wlan_tkip/wlan_ccmp don't get pulled in because wpa_supplicant
doesn't 'match' my SSID/BSSID.  When I remove the bssid declaration,
association works (wlan_tkip/wlan_ccmp get pulled in etc).  It of course
picks whichever AP wpa_supplicant chooses (using default ap_scan=1
(wpa_supplicant controls scanning / selection - NOT the driver)).

I had thought this was a problem with svn madwifi drivers, but even
using the default *restricted* modules from Hardy (madwifi 0.9.4) this
behaviour persists.

I've been essentially using the same wpa_supplicant.conf since Dapper I
believe.  Since I'm submitting this now via my WPA AP at my house,
obviously the driver is working.  I am of the opinion that this is a
wpa_supplicant issue because with ap_scan=1 (the default),
wpa_supplicant is responsible for doing scanning and picking the AP.

** Affects: wpasupplicant (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
[Hardy] wpa_supplicant fails to associate if bssid is specified in network block
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224036
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to